1/9/08



The
performance of this 8-bay roughly equals the Channel Master 4228. While the smaller screen hurts the DB-8 some,
it has a better feed system than the 4228.
Note that the
gain graphs are the result of simulations, and those simulations did not
include the loss in the combiner. The
author has not yet measured this combiner.
Combiners often lose 1 or 2 dB at the highest channels. (Balun loss also is not included for this or
any other antenna.)
The right and
left dipoles are set farther apart (by 3.4 inches) on the DB-8, compared to the
4228. This results in larger minor lobes
in the azimuth (view from overhead) pattern, but it also narrows the main
lobe. As a result the DB-8 is probably
better at rejecting multi-path than the 4228.
The major null is at about 25° for the DB-8, 30° for the 4228. The following table shows the beam widths
(measured to the half-power points):
ch 20: ch
30: ch 40: ch 50: ch 60: average:
DB-8 25.3° 23.2° 21.0° 19.0° 17.7° 21.2°
4228 32.2° 26.2° 25.7° 22.3° 19.4° 25.2°
DAT-75 44.3° 39.2° 34.8° 30.5° 26.6° 35.0°
This antenna
has been optimized for the higher UHF channels while its competitors, the
Channel Master 4228 and the Winegard PR-8800, have been optimized for the lower
UHF channels. The DB-8 performance is
nearly identical to the XG91, making one wonder why AntennasDirect sells both
of these antennas. After 2/17/09, when
the higher UHF channels are gone, the DB-8 will be at a distinct disadvantage
when compared to the 4228 or PR-8800.
AntennasDirect
calls the DB-2, DB-4, and DB-8 “Multi-directional antennas”. There is good justification for calling the
DB-2 and DB-4 multi-directional, but the DB-8 is one of the most directional
antennas you can buy. AntennasDirect is
simply flat wrong about this. You must
keep in mind that an 8-bay is very different from its kin.
The simulations
show a problem at channel 16 for the DB-4 and DB-8. This is the result of a resonance (large
current) in the vertical rods that support the dipoles. The author has not measured the real antennas
to verify that this resonance is not below channel 14. (The simulation could be slightly off on the
frequency of this resonance.)
High gain
antennas like this one are big, hard to aim, and hard to keep up in bad
weather. The author does not normally
recommend this antenna inside 25 miles.
But there are two exceptions to this:
This page is part of “An HDTV Primer”, which
starts at www.hdtvprimer.com